Skip to content
Column and beam formwork casting long shadows

Our Process

Every project is a sequence of decisions, not a single number.

Five stages, each starting from a defined input and ending in a clear decision and a documented output — from file intake to handover.

  • 01 Files & Qualification
  • 02 Technical Review
  • 03 Scope & Quotation
  • 04 Execution & Reporting
  • 05 Inspection & Handover
Illustrative image

01The five stages

Input, decision, output and owner — at every stage.

01

Files & Qualification

A levelled residential plot in north Riyadh marked with survey stakes and string linesIllustrative image

Input

  • Location
  • Permit
  • Plans
  • Scope
  • Timing
  • Budget readiness

Decision

Is the file complete enough to move into technical review?

Output

A qualified file ready for technical review — or a list of what's still missing.

Responsibility

The client submits the files; Constrak reviews them and decides on qualification.
02

Technical Review

Two engineers reviewing drawings on a tablet on siteIllustrative image

Input

  • Completeness
  • Conflicts
  • Quantities
  • Site requirements
  • Pricing assumptions

Decision

Is the technical basis sound enough to price, or does it need clarification or a site visit first?

Output

A verified technical basis, ready for pricing.

Responsibility

Constrak's technical team reviews; a site visit, when needed, is a joint step.
03

Scope & Quotation

A site-office table with architectural drawings, a helmet and a scale rulerIllustrative image

Input

  • Inclusions
  • Exclusions
  • Duration
  • Milestones
  • Responsibilities

Decision

What's included, what's excluded, and on what schedule?

Output

A written quotation, itemized line by line, clear enough to compare.

Responsibility

Constrak issues the quotation; the client reviews it and decides whether to proceed.

Supporting evidence

Why an itemized, line-by-line scope matters

ItemQuote AQuote BWhy it matters
Spoil removalIncludedNot mentionedCost can appear later
InsulationSpecified system“Excellent insulation”Specification is unclear
TestingSpecifiedNot mentionedResponsibility uncertain
External worksIncludedExcludedPrices are not comparable
ChangesWritten processVerbalDispute risk
Execution durationClear scheduleNumber of months onlyNo sequencing basis

Two anonymized illustrative quotations explaining the effect of scope ambiguity — not real quotes from any contractor.

04

Execution & Reporting

Pouring and levelling a villa roof slabIllustrative image

Input

  • Quality checkpoints
  • Progress evidence
  • Decisions
  • Changes

Decision

Did every quality checkpoint pass before work continued?

Output

A documented progress record, with any change approved in writing.

Responsibility

Constrak executes and documents; the client reviews the evidence and approves any change.
05

Inspection & Handover

A finished Najdi-modern villa at duskIllustrative image

Input

  • Snagging
  • Closeout
  • Documents
  • Handover

Decision

Does the completed work match the agreed scope?

Output

A closed snagging list, and complete handover documents.

Responsibility

The inspection is a joint step; Constrak closes the file once it's handed over to the client.
Facade complete with boundary wall, gate and newly planted palms
Illustrative image

Stage one

Every project starts with a complete file.

Location, permit, plans, scope, timing and budget readiness — the inputs of stage one, before any technical review or pricing.